First Refugee Center Attacked In UK As Immigration ‘Conspiracy’ Unmasked

First Refugee Center Attacked In UK As Immigration ‘Conspiracy’ Unmasked
March 2, 2016 Admin

The first attack on a refugee center in the UK occurred around 2 am last night. This comes just two days after The Telegraph reported on a new Tony Blair biography that accuses him of executing a “conspiracy” during the 1990’s and early 2000’s to flood the United Kingdom with immigrants without the populace’s consent or awareness.

The details of the attack come from The Liverpool Echo:

A suspected petrol bomb attack on an asylum seeker centre is being treated as a race-hate crime.

A flaming object was flung at a front window of multi-occupancy flats in Aintree , in the early hours of Sunday morning, shattering the glass.

Police attended the address on Church Avenue just before 2am and found fire damage to the front of the property, which used to operate as the Bounty House hotel, close to Aintree Racecourse.

Now it has emerged detectives suspect the arson is racially motivated.

Locals said a variety of asylum seekers, from different countries, lived at the 15-bed centre.

Serco workers, who now operate the building, said the occupants spoke very little English.

Chief Inspector Matt Boyle said: “The latest incident is being investigated by specialist detectives from the force’s SIGMA team, who are dedicated to investigating incidents of hate crime.

“No-one should be targeted in this way, whether that be for their race, beliefs or disability.”
An 18-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of arson over the weekend and is being quizzed by police on suspicion of committing arson with intent to endanger life.

The UK has not seen large-scale arson attacks on refugee centers, as countries such as Germany and Sweden have. This is most likely because the UK’s mass immigration tends to be of a more economic type, and thus there are fewer of such centers, compared with the “humanitarian superpower” Sweden, and similarly focused Germany. Each of these countries has rather focused on the “refugee” side of mass migration, bringing in (literally) millions of such “refugees”, who are then given free housing, medical care, food, and counseling in so-called “refugee centers”.

In this regard the UK is in substance quite different from Germany and Sweden, and the roots of its own mass migration go back to the late 40’s and early 50’s. At that point it was primarily non-white citizens of British colonies abroad, such as Jamaicans and Indians and Pakistanis, who were being brought to Britain. The scale of migration steadily grew over the decades hence, until now the UK is in as tenuous a situation as any nation in Europe, with the exception of perhaps Sweden. Many people have long associated the 1990’s with the most aggressive of these mass-migration efforts, however, and their suspicions now seem to be receiving confirmation, according to a new article from The Telegraph:

Tony Blair is accused of ‘presiding over a silent conspiracy’ that allowed two million migrants to enter Britain during his decade in power.

A new biography of the former prime minister by the celebrated investigative journalist Tom Bower claims Mr Blair ordered his Labour government not to publicly discuss the issue.

“Asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in Britain. Removal takes too long and it’s emotional,” [said] Barbara Roche, immigration minister

The book Broken Vows: Tony Blair – the Tragedy of Power alleges that the minister in charge of border control ruled against deporting failed asylum seekers because it would be too “emotional” to do so.

The article continues…

Mr Bower interviewed more than 200 senior civil servants, ex-ministers and insiders and claims Mr Blair told officials and ministers: “Don’t mention the advantages of immigration in public because they won’t even want that.”

The book claims that Mr Blair and his Government ‘cynically repackaged’ asylum seekers as economic migrants to the benefit of 350,000 asylum seekers.

It alleges that Barbara Roche, the immigration minister between 1999 and 2001, told a senior immigration official: “Asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in Britain. Removal takes too long and it’s emotional.”

According to some estimates as many as 2.3 million migrants came to the UK during new Labour’s stranglehold on power from 1997 to 2010.

This hearkens back to an argument I made in Counter-Currents last year, that a potential form of 4GW protest in Europe could be the symbolic “trial” and “execution” of traitorous European leaders. Tony Blair would certainly be a prime candidate for such an exercise.

With the UK government cracking down on all forms of political opposition when it comes to mass-migration, it will be informative to see whether incidents like this Molotov-Cocktail attack become more regular.

The question of how effective they will be is also one to ask. As we discussed recently in relation to Germany, the key is connecting such actions to the broader issue plaguing the native British (and European) people, which is their displacement, rape, murder, and, arguably, genocide.

By connecting acts of political protest and political violence to this program of government-instigated suicide and genocide, the acts become linked with the feelings of the broader populace and achieve an outsized level of power within the moral level of war. An example of this is explained well in this article on Anders Behring Breivik by Greg Johnson. As previously noted on this website, random attacks against refugee centers are anonymous, with their motives by definition lacking clarity, and therefore unable to be leveraged into a large “moral” outrage or focus, and thus not as effective in the moral/strategic layer of war.

With that said, acts such as the one in Liverpool last night are certainly evidence that the population of the UK is losing patience and hope in government, and can be viewed as one of the first signs that the people are awakening, and will eventually fight for their homeland and their future, and fight to stop allowing politicians like Tony Blair and David Cameron to lie and lobby towards the death of their nation’s native people.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments (7)

  1. Laguna Beach Fogey 1 year ago

    In order to oust the White settlers and liberate their countries from colonialist rule, African and Asian Nationalists resorted to force and violence, including unconventional, irregular methods. European Nationalists will have to do the same against the third world occupation settler population. What’s good for the goose…

    Support the British Resistance!

    • Author
      Admin 1 year ago

      Agreed completely.

  2. Laguna Beach Fogey 1 year ago

    Remember: European Nationalists occupy the moral high ground and are 100% justified in using any means necessary to liberate their nations.

  3. ProLepanto 1 year ago

    The trick is to not have those with the moral fiber for kinetic action to be locked up before their character is needed most. Is an evidently mostly ineffective Molotov cocktail worth losing the man willing to throw it for however long the Gramsci-ian shills will lock him up for?
    Largely symbolic resistance, as this was, is only worth something when the actor can be martyred figuratively (or actually) so that the actor is seen as the man before the tanks of Tienanmen Square, rather than a Klansman burning a cross…

    • Author
      Admin 1 year ago

      You make an exceedingly good point Lepanto… Martyrdom is a HUGE 4GW victory, whether, like you said, figurative, or literal.

      I believe that our people engaging in resistance that renders them squarely in a martyred role would truly be the best 4GW action possible. I think Greg Johnson really nailed it in that article I linked to talking about Anders Behring Breivak, and how if he hadn’t killed all those teenagers he really would have kept the moral high ground, which would have been compounded by his imprisonment, into placing him into a more sympathetic role, instead of the monstrous one he now inhabits (and through which he instead gave the Norwegian government a victory, in that their incarceration of him actually seems quite reasonable by comparison).

      But yeah, the Tienanmen Square reference is spot on, anything in Europe that can replicate that would be amazing. Food for thought for us all.

  4. ProLepanto 1 year ago

    Yes, Breivak wanted to do too much single handedly. He wanted to wipe out a generation of the turncoats which sold out and continued to sell out his homeland. But he gave them too much credit as individuals, that is to say their political value to the leftist cause was overstated as actual people. The fact of the matter is that pseudo intelligentsia spouting multiculturalism are a dime a dozen. They are cranked out like an assembly line from every university save for some private institutions. Killing them with the efficiency of the Khmer Rouge, would not likely be enough to outpace their production now, never-mind after the production is ramped up in the wake of such killings.
    We fight in a Colosseum, where the crowd truly decides our fate, not the other combatants (not yet), and we win the crowd’s hearts through our narrative, our performance. Killing decisively may win respect and or fear but it will not earn sympathy, it will not earn outrage at the thought of our demise.

    • Author
      Admin 1 year ago

      I think you are absolutely spot on. ISIS for all their evil and sickness is certainly understand the almost cinematic landscape we all find ourselves in with the worldwide web, 24 hour news, etc. They are absolute psychotic nutjobs but the “arena” is the same.

      And then as far as the arena and Breivak, as I have said before, if he had only killed adult male members of ethno-suicidalist political parties, I think public perception of him amongst native Norwegian and native Europeans in general would have been far different, and much more positive.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *