One of the chief hypocrisies often pointed out when observing the insanity of modern Europeans revolves around the contradiction of propping up Islamism while simultaneously embracing homosexual rights, womens’ rights, transgender rights, etc. The Muslims believe in none of these ideas. Indeed, most Muslims in Europe hate homosexuality and radical feminism far more than any right-wing Evangelical in Iowa might.
How then is it that the Europeans so unreservedly embrace Islam? How is it that they invite unfettered millions of Muslims into their countries? Indeed, we can find countless examples of this contradiction. We have radical feminists arguing that women should not be dressing provocatively, because it is insensitive to Muslims. We have homosexuals who denounce other homosexuals for having gay rights parades in Muslim areas and labelling them “insensitive”, “Islamophobic”, and “racist” as a result. The contradiction seems readily apparent.
I myself have inveighed this accusation at the European left on occasion. However, as time goes on, it begins to make more sense. This is because things like homosexual rights, transgender rights, radical feminism, and everything else, are not celebrated and embraced by the left because of anything intrinsic about them. They do not adopt and fight for these lifestyles because they believe them to be “good”, but rather purely because they are in opposition to the established order of things and our inherited traditions and morals.
In this regard leftism is not so much about a coherent ideology, but rather about pure “Negationism”. This is why many people call it Cultural Marxism. Just as Marxism tried to upend things from an economic perspective, and allow the proletariat (the economically “oppressed”) to take back power from the bourgeoisie (the economically “powerful”), Cultural Marxism is the concept of those who have been socially or culturally “oppressed” taking back societal power from their oppressors. Therefore in this veritable religion of Cultural-Marxism or “Negationism”, the primary driver of “progress” is to negate all established power dynamics. If men have historically oppressed women, in this narrative, women must take back power over men. If straight people have historically oppressed gays, then gays must take back power from straights. And while the historic accuracy of the idea is rather dubious, in this left-wing narrative, colonialist Europeans have historically oppressed Muslims, and therefore Muslims taking back power over Europeans is considered “progress”, and thus something “progressives” support.
Indeed, there is no greater conceivable form of negation than all of Europe, the historical “power” in the world for the last 1000+ years, having that power taken back by the poor, “downtrodden” Muslims. And this is why, for progressives, Islam supercedes all other celebrated victim groups. If an African-American and a Muslim get into an altercation in New York City and exchange invectives, it is the “Islamophobic” black person we hear about, not the “racist” Arab. And this is why left-wing gays, left-wing feminists, and all the nasally-voiced “Diversity Studies” professors who support them, always defer to the Muslims.
The end result of this is a Europe where young native Europeans are raised to be meek, submissive, and guilt-ridden, and where the vast hordes of Muslim immigrants are buoyed, confident, and aggressive (and well-fed on the state dime). With such being the case, with our culture in Europe being so terminally ill, and our young people schooled in this religion of negation, is it any wonder we see videos like this?
Note: This article originally contained a video here of several Turkish teens beating up a young German teen who refuses to fight back and, to put it politely, doesn’t acquit himself very well from a perspective of ‘toughness’. The primary Turkish antagonist seems irritated by this unwillingness to fight back, and as he seems to loses more and more respect for the German teen he is crueler and crueler.
Also: Big thanks to Robert for sending me the above video so that we can use it as an object lesson of these unhappy facts.
Indeed, there is no other explanation beyond the religion of progressivism that emerged in the 1960’s. The following quote elucidates this:
“The major break in the understanding of manliness is not between, say, the nineteenth century and any particular preceding era but between my generation of Baby Boomers and the entire proceeding complex of teachings. In some ways, TR and Churchill have more in common with Homer and Shakespeare than they do with us.” –Waller Newell
The Turkish immigrant in the video beating up the young German similarly has more in common with Homer or Teddy Roosevelt than he does with the young German. To him, the German is an affront to masculinity, and beyond that, an affront to nature. Of course, he would not articulate it in those words, but his disgust as the pathetic reaction of the young German shows it. The German, on the other hand, having been raised since the advent of 1960’s Negationism, has no other response but meekness and submission, for that is how he has been raised.
We, of course, are disgusted by the video, and disgusted and enraged at the entire turn of events. For whatever various reasons, each of us has not ended up being victim to this ideological cancer. As a result, our struggle, our own cultural “jihad”, to borrow a good term from the Islamists, is two-fold: first, to awaken the sleeping masses around us, the millions upon millions of young men like that in the video above, and in so doing topple the governments who are plunging Europe off a suicidal cliff of “Negationism”, and secondly to expel the Muslim hordes who have moved into this power vacuum. Indeed, our greatest hope is that this sudden influx of Muslims, replaying scenes like the above video in towns all across Western Europe, will be the wake-up call, the catalyst, that our people need. With that being the case, we can stand up, re-embrace the glory, honor, and strength our ancestors have bequeathed us, reclaim their honor, and fight.