I thought I would share the following post.
It is from Brandon Smith at alt-market.com, and is titled “Globalists Want To Destroy Conservative Principles – But They Need Our Help”
I think I stumbled upon it on Zero Hedge, if I remember right. I had never been exposed to the author before but he seems to write about alot of the same things we regularly discuss here (4th Generation Warfare, the OODA Loop, revolution, geopolitics, strategy) but from a ‘Liberty’ perspective, which I guess I would roughly equate to the Tea Party movement we saw during President Obama’s years in office (although I suppose its possible that those in it might quibble with that comparison).
The article discusses the motives of the Progressive/Globalist axis in their increasing drive to deligitimize Trump and catalyze societal destabilization in America.
The author states:
It is important to note, however, that all of these protests and the increase in violence is not taking place in a vacuum. As many liberty analysts have noted, Trump has hardly had time to do anything yet that would warrant national protests. Is Trump really the only catalyst? Not quite. The mainstream media and globalists like George Soros have been very effective in agitating or outright paying protesters and provocateurs to generate zombie mobs of gullible Leftists to use as a billy club for harassing conservatives.
That said, I want liberty activists and analysts to ponder on this for a moment — to what end is this being done? Why is Soros so interested in fomenting leftist rage? Is it designed to overthrow Trump? To initiate mob action and frighten conservatives into silence? Or do the globalists have a greater and more important goal in mind?
I have been writing often on the idea of 4th Generation Warfare the past month, and I think my readers are now well versed in the concept of the “three-steps-ahead” style of tactics, as well as the concept of manipulating an opponent to destroy himself, rather than fighting him directly. These are not new methods, the globalists have merely taken them to the next level.
He is of course quite accurate in describing the nature of the struggle. Those opposed to Trump here in America are attempting to provoke Trump into crackdowns that will make him and his administration appear as an unlikeable and oppressive ‘Goliath’. This will cause middle of the road Americans to shrink away from him and lose sympathy or support for him. Trump will have lost the ‘moral-strategic’ box of war and his presidency will fail. In their most vivid fantasies Trump is impeached and put in prison.
This is actually the mirror image of what our side is doing in Europe (or at least trying to do to some extent), in provoking the Merkel’s and Hollande’s of the continent into cracking down on native European anti-mass migration dissidents, looking like evil ‘Goliath’s’, and losing the support of ‘normies’.
The author goes on:
There is a point I have been trying to make for most of the year that I think has been consistently missed by many in the liberty movement. That point being that the greatest danger to conservatives is NOT militant Leftists, but how we RESPOND to militant Leftists. That is to say, I believe the globalists are using the Left as a cattle prod to enrage conservatives and lure us into abandoning our principles in the name of defeating Marxists.
As examples of what this might look like, he goes on:
As an alternative analyst I am privy to trends in the liberty movement and in conservative circles that might not be immediately obvious to casual readers. Already, I am witnessing calls among conservatives to abuse government power to defeat the Left. I have seen comments such as:
“Trump should use the NDAA to imprison these leftists indefinitely…”
“The only solution is to throw the leftists into FEMA camps…”
“Trump needs to shut down the leftist media…”
“Sometimes it is okay to bend the rules of the constitution if you have the right president…”
And comments like this are popping up everywhere in liberty media boards. Now, I recognize that some of this talk is being posted by paid disinformation agents and provocateurs, but, I have heard regular conservatives and patriots, people who are long time proponents of the Constitution, echo similar sentiments.
I often use the analogy of the “One Ring” from The Lord Of The Rings to describe big government power. I really can’t find a better fictional symbol. Anyone who comes into possession of the “one ring” is eventually corrupted by it. Many good people believe that its darker energy can be contained and directed for good purposes, but they, too, are ultimately undone by it. The only answer, the only solution, is to abandon the ring, or to destroy it.
From there he ends with this conclusion:
Again, conservatives are being led by globalists into the temptations of power. The only way for us to fight back is to maintain our principles and refuse to support ANY government measure that is unConstitutional, even if it is to be used against our enemies. The only way that the heritage of liberty can be defeated is if the proponents and champions of liberty forsake it. We beat the globalists in the long run by standing by our ideals and fighting back within the bounds of the principles we hold dear. Dominance through government is never the answer.
Now, some in our more Identitarian corner of the internet will immediately dislike his point, and label it ‘Principled Defeat’, or a cargo cult based around ‘muh constitution’. I don’t think that would be fair to the author though, because- depending on how you understand him- I think he is making an excellent point.
I do not want the Trump administration to become some corrupt South American dictatorship. That’s not the kind of strong, Nationalistic government we need. I don’t want journalists kidnapped and dropped out of helicopters (although the thought is tempting, trust me), I don’t want people’s phones illegally wiretapped, I don’t want Antifa tortured in interrogation centers, I don’t want random people put in FEMA camps without trial.
Human history has been full of such things. Torture, violence, and extra-legal authority has been the rule for most of our existence, and STILL IS the rule in most of the Muslim world, much of Africa, and parts of South America. That the West evolved past that is precisely why we should be so protective of our borders and demographics!
With that being said though, I WOULD support an authoritarian, right-wing government in America as long as rule of law continued. That is the distinction. I support authoritarianism, the Mannerbunde, blood and soil thinking completely (or what the left incorrectly labels ‘fascism’). The key distinction is whether the rule of law is still pre-eminent though.
By this I mean that people understand the laws, the laws are fairly enforced, and there is consistency and justice in their application. The two ideas are not in mutually exclusive at all.
Examples of the kind of ‘authoritarian’ ideas I am thinking of would be the following:
-Banning all Muslim immigration (not because I ‘hate’ them but because we know the horrific end results of Muslim immigration in the West from looking at Europe).
-Temporarily halting all immigration from all countries (because mass-immigration destroys societal cohesion and asabiya).
-Arresting/prosecuting/etc any government officials who assist illegal immigrants to come to or remain in the country.
-Engaging in a widespread investigation into academia, specifically left-wing indoctrination and propaganda within publicly-funded universities, and taking steps to completely eliminate this problem.
-Banning George Soros-funded NGO’s.
-Banning the Muslim Brotherhood and all like organizations.
-Using every legal means necessary to take power away from the leftist media, as well as investigating them for ties to foreign nationals like Soros and Carlos Slim attempting to do harm to America.
-Retroactively removing citizenship from anchor babies, family-reunification recipients, etc.
-Utilizing ‘carrot and stick’ techniques to facilitate voluntary repatriation of immigrants, and engaging in forced deportation of others whose presence legitimately endangers Americans (criminals, La Raza members, radical Muslims, etc).
-(Possibly) creating ethnic homelands within the United States for various groups (this is a major hypothetical but it is something that I would potentially support depending on how it was carried out, and I am guessing it is something that most likely falls outside the constitution) Note: This wouldn’t be something ‘forced’ or violent, but I think many black Americans- and many white Americans- would support giving each a number of contiguous states as separate ‘homelands’.
That is just within America. Within a hypothetical future blood and soil nation in post-Reconquest Europe, there are additional things I could imagine.
The question of Europe really brings up the other thoughts the article catalyzed in me, which is the difference between the situation there and the situation here in America.
In America I agree with the author that those on the right- whether in the Trump administration or civilians- should NOT engage in actions which are illegal, unconstituional, purposeful in causing societal destabilization, etc. I think the best case scenario in America is to change our system democratically into a strong, authoritarian, right-wing government based in the rule of law.
In Europe however the situation is far different. Over there the rule of law has already been tossed out the window. The radical Progressive/Suicidalist governments of countries like Germany, France, the UK, and Sweden are racing toward national suicide, importing millions of Muslim immigrants in ways that cannot even be remotely considered legal or appropriate, and are imprisoning and harassing any citizens who express disagreement with them. We have profiled this over and over again on the site. These governments are literally funding Antifa groups that commit violence and other crimes against right-wing voters. These governments are failing to enforce laws on rape and violence when the acts are committed by immigrants, and using oppressive court systems to imprison nationalists for merely speaking out non-violently online.
Furthermore, the ‘democratic’, and ‘constitutional’ bases these countries are supposedly built on have lost all legitimacy and meaning because- as we often point out- the voting process has been hijacked through mass-immigration. All of these governments are able to perpetually stay in power by importing Muslim immigrants who will vote for them. We saw this in Austria and we will see it in the French and German elections as well.
For these reasons my take on Europe is different, and I no longer believe there is any reason to seek solutions within the ‘rule of law’. This site does not encourage violence or illegality of course, but what I am saying is that the only hope most Western European nations have at this is a swift fall into destabilization and anarchy, in which the reigns of power can be seized by new forces that are not a part of the fundamentalist-Progressive vision of white self-hatred and national-suicide.
The author of the above piece does not discuss Europe in it, so I would be very curious about his thoughts on the matter.
In reading his responses to some of the comments on the above article, he doesn’t seem to be too far away from my own thinking on the situation in America, and does seem to want Trump to be strong in his drive to consolidate power.
Really this is the only solution. I might be misinterpreting his thinking, but I disagree with the above-quoted line where he says:
We beat the globalists in the long run by standing by our ideals and fighting back within the bounds of the principles we hold dear.
This can only be the case if mass-immigration (both legal and illegal) is completely halted. As long as it continues there is no victory for us that is possible. If the next forty years looks (from an immigration perspective) the way the last forty years looked, America will end disastrously.
Its possible the author also recognizes this, but it is the salient point upon which the future of our people rests. As Ann Coulter once provocatively said (to Glenn Beck I believe), “I don’t care if Trump is doing abortions in the Oval Office, as long as he puts a stop to immigration.”
To preserve the future of America however, Trump and the rest of his team must consolidate power to a pretty huge degree. That is what will save (the historic) American nation, while in Europe it is the current governments’ loss of power that will save our people, and the historic Europe we were birthed from.
How these things can be accomplished, and how each of us as individuals can contribute, is the key question going forward.
We must each do everything we can to work towards these important- but opposite- goals.
1) To help the Trump administration consolidate and strengthen power in America, and turn it into an authoritarian, nationalistic nation that is still based in fairness and the rule of law.
2) To effect the delegitimization of all Suicidalist Western European governments, hasten their already-inescapable downfall, and ensure they are replaced by strong Identitarian governments that will repatriate all Muslim immigrants, halt all further immigration, and turn as much of Western Europe as possible into sacred blood and soil homelands for our people, just like every other group of people on earth enjoy.