What Would A Trump Presidency Mean For The War In Europe?

What Would A Trump Presidency Mean For The War In Europe?
April 29, 2016 Admin

Editors Note: This article was originally published on Counter-Currents.


What Would A Trump Presidency Mean For The War In Europe?

After winning primary contests in five more states, Donald Trump looks like he will most likely become the Republican Nominee. Indeed, Trump didn’t just win narrow victories, he won every single county and every single Congressional District in all five states. He annihilated his opponents — Cruz and Kasich — and may well have vaulted over the clutching tentacles of the #NeverTrump movement and squarely into the GOP captain’s seat, squaring-off against Hilary Clinton.

In that general election matchup I feel strongly that Trump will win. He has proven himself to be light years ahead of every other candidate in terms of strategy. He has played the media like a fiddle, and understands the modern news cycle and how to position oneself tactically in ways previous candidates have never come close to. I predict that in a general election matchup against Hilary Clinton Trump will come away with a strong victory, an event that would have seemed completely impossible a year ago.

While I will leave it to others to analyze the impact this will have here in America where it is taking place, I am more concerned with the impact it might have in Europe, where the majority of my focus and concern rests, and where our people’s survival is most immediately threatened.

In this regard I feel there are both pros and cons to a potential Trump presidency. We face in Europe today a steadily-building wave of terrorism, mass rape, demographic replacement, and what can only be described as the purposeful genocide of White citizens by left-wing, negationist, suicidalist governments. This portends a crisis greater than WWI, WWII, or even the Black Death. This is not hyperbole. In most West European nations today, the 18-30 year old male demographic — those of fighting age — will be majority Muslim in the next 1-5 years.

This is the most sudden and violent societal transformation in the history of the continent, if not the earth, and bodes tremendously ill for native Europeans. There is no nation in the world’s history in which Muslims have become a majority that was not eventually conquered completely by Islam, with its non-Muslim inhabitants either forcibly converted or enslaved. And indeed in Europe today we already see the beginnings of this from the Muslim population. We are witnessing mass ethnically-driven rape against native European women and children that would be considered war crimes in any other place on earth, as well as massive levels of criminality, complete opposition to their host societies’ governments, and continued, consistent anti-state terrorism (4th-Generation Warfare). All of this should have been expected, but as it was not, or was allowed to occur anyway.

Europe now looks likely to descend into horrors beyond our worst nightmares. What impact a Trump presidency might have on Europe at this critical juncture is thus a question of significant importance.

Ancient painting 2 too small though for headline picture

There are a number of potential positives which I will discuss first.

1. A Trump Presidency would increase the visibility and legitimacy of Identitarian thought. The President of the most important nation on earth could, to at least some extent, be referred to as “proudly Europeanp-American.” Through the temporary banning of Muslims, he would be publicly declaring that culture matters, that some cultures are superior to others, and that Muslims represent a threat to Western society. His administration would be supporting closed borders, and opposing unfettered multinational corporatism. Surely this must have a positive impact across the Atlantic, at least in its ability to project these thought-patterns into mainstream society.

2. Trump could potentially exert leverage on European leaders to stop the wholesale genocide of their people. Trump has attacked European-suicidalism on numerous occasions, and just the other day endorsed Matteo Salvini, the anti-immigration Northern League candidate seeking to become Italian Prime Minister. The survival of White Europeans would be a concern of a Trump administration, which is more than we can say for most Western leaders. It should not be considered overly-optimistic to hope that Trump’s aforementioned strategic genius, and his obvious concern for Europe’s future, could combine to potentially improve the situation there for our people.

3. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, is the template a Trump victory and Trump administration would represent for European nations. This is because Trump’s success is, among other things, a response to the increasingly 4GW nature of the world. William S. Lind, one of the fathers of 4th-Generation Warfare theory, says that this will be the century of the nation-state’s disintegration, as non-state forces and non-state identities increasingly rip apart the fabrics of the nation-state system. He predicts that only strong countries with robust, autocratic governments, working to cultivate and ensure strong “shared identity-groups,” will be able to survive. We are in fact already witnessing this phenomenon. In Russia it took place almost twenty years ago, and interestingly that could very well be attributed to the fact that Russia was at that time facing 4GW disintegration — where multiple non-state actors and identity groups were facilitating the destabilization of the Russian nation from within — that is very much like what is facing Europe today. The Russian people turned to Putin and his strength-based, nationalist, traditionalist policies, and have for the most part righted their ship and ensured their people’s continued survival. We are seeing the same thing today in Poland and Hungary, where nationalist, autocratic governments have been elected, and are taking pains to build their nations’ societal cohesion, eliminate or prevent the build-up of non-state threats (immigrants primarily), and set their countries on a course for survival. In my opinion the rise of Trump in America represents the exact same thing, as normal White Americans note with dread the rise of Hispanic Nationalism within their borders, “refugee” resettlement, Islam, left-wing hatred of Whites and White men specifically, and the insidious effects of multinational-corporatism. They are turning to Trump as an autocratic force from within their same shared identity-group, to (again) “right the ship” and expel those forces that threaten the American (or White American) “tribe.” This can continue the template that Russia, Poland, and Hungary represent, and hopefully demonstrate to Western European nations a potential path to survival.

Of course in Western Europe it will not be as simple as that, as most of these nations will need to fight violent insurrections if not civil wars with the vast populations of Muslims they have brought into their lands. This brings up the one “neutral” or “unknown” influence of a Trump administration I would like to point out, which is his position vis-à-vis ISIS, the Islamic State. So far at least, Trump has proclaimed his desire to invade Syria and Iraq, and forcefully take out ISIS. If he did this, it would be emotionally satisfying in the short term but disastrous from a 4GW vs. nation-state perspective. The main concern is that it would undoubtedly make ISIS far stronger, in that it would earn them the sympathy and loyalty of an even broader segment of the Muslim world. By attacking them, Trump would in fact give them legitimacy within the minds of Muslims. That could be a negative, and end up harming the Occident in several ways.

But it could also potentially be a positive. For the more powerful Islamism gets and the more outwardly aggressive Muslims in Europe become, the quicker all-out 4GW will begin within its borders. It is in our strategic interest for 4GW hostilities to break out in Europe now, rather than later, for every year Europe becomes home to far more Muslims, particularly in that crucially important male 18-30 year old demographic. The traitorous European elites can cite “official” statistics as often as they want that show Muslims only making up small percentages of various European populations, and while the vast number of native European Baby-Boomers are still alive those statistics might even be half true. But the bottom line is that when over half of your nation’s fighting-age men are Muslims, you are already a Muslim nation or soon to be one. Demographics are destiny, one just has to know which statistics to look at.

That leaves us to discuss one negative impact I believe a Trump presidency would have on Europe. At first glance it appears almost incidental, but this is unfortunately not the case. This is the fact that the election of Donald Trump would cause the entire mainstream, Left-wing, self-hating White population of Europe to double-down on negationist, Cultural-Marxist insanity. It would be like the presidency of George W. Bush times 100, as millions upon millions of brainwashed Europeans dive into a suicidal orgy of virtue-signaling, heaping wood upon their already blazing funeral pyre. We might see the importation of Muslim “refugees” rise to levels far-surpassing what we see now. We very likely would see a negative electoral impact on Right-wing, anti-immigration parties. This would have disastrous effects upon Europe. And despite their idiocy there will be nothing funny about it, because all of these actions will lead to mass-rapes of native European children, attacks on our vulnerable and elderly, overwhelming levels of crime, terrorism, and other manifold horrors. Not to mention an even-bleaker demographic picture.

This concern is similar to why Jack Donovan argued for a Hilary Clinton Presidency, since it will at least “wake men up” to just how reviled and unwanted they are by America’s ruling class. While this is humorous it also conceals a hugely critical truth, which is that our movement is almost never to be served by the election of parties or individuals just because they are moderately or ostensibly closer to our beliefs. In Europe especially, our greatest hope is for the system as a whole to fall apart, so that it can be replaced with something else. It is hard to see any path to survival in Europe if the current political systems continue — both those of individual nations and the EU as a whole. They are not functional and robust enough in their current form to face the battle that is coming, even were they to have the “right” political parties governing them. In this regard, if a Donald Trump victory in America strengthens governments and Left-wing parties in Europe, it could represent no less than a death knell for our ancestral homelands.

The question of whether Trump is elected president, and what that would portend for Europe, is one more momentous issue for these turbulent times. Let us not be blind to the magnitude of events, for surely our descendants will read about them in the history books for long centuries to come. The next decade will mark either Europe’s submission and death, or its decision to fight and survive. A two thousand year old civilization stands on the edge of a knife. And no matter what happens in the American Presidential Election, in the French one, in the Austrian one; I do not believe that politicians will decide Europe’s fate. It will be the individual members of our race that decide it. Our destiny resides in our willingness to fight; to give our time, our treasure, and perhaps our lives, for the future of our people. With this being the case, it lends clarity to the question of Trump’s — or any other candidate’s — potential victory. For we should hope for their election not for what they might do for Europe, but for how that result might aid the fight for its survival that we shall undertake.

Comments (32)

  1. Laguna Beach Fogey 2 years ago

    I attended the Trump rally last night in Costa Mesa. I couldn’t get in, so I parked nearby and hung out outside, watching the demonstrations. Observed the behaviour of the assembled crowd, mostly Mexican schoolkids and local Marxist agitators, and the police.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Very interesting. Hopefully a Trump campaign will shine a spotlight on Hispanic-Nationalism here in America and wake more White people up to the threat it represents.

      • Laguna Beach Fogey 2 years ago

        From a military standpoint, if (or when) full-blown ethic conflict sets off in the US, those protesters are toast.

        • Author
          Admin 2 years ago

          You didn’t write that report from the Costa Mesa Trump rally did you? Thought I remembered seeing you say something about going to the rally on Twitter or in the comments on here or something, then I saw the report today on DS.

  2. Ste-G 2 years ago

    Very interesting guy. He doesn’t think much of Merkel, so when he’s president (hopefully), I will order my ticket to be a fly on the wall, for his first meeting with the frumpy frau.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Lol it is a glorious thing to imagine isn’t it.

  3. Michael 2 years ago

    We need a Donald Trump in Europe if only to create a rallying cry for sanity. I also think that no politician can change the speeding train running wild through Europe. Trump only creates a quiver in the lake of sewage we call modern life. Can the US administration ever be a positive cause for Europe or is more likely to fuel the European funeral pyre ? It certainly encouraged the idea that money and economic power is more important than cultural and national identity. We are no longer British but consumers, and economic are the political gods, which modern man bows to. And life under the corrupt politicans will be no different to living under British Muslim leaders, or so they think.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      You are 100% right Michael. The consumerism rotting Europe from within definitely started in the United States, where it continues to effect the same rot. Consumption and materialism, the Iron Crown as Tolkien foresaw.

  4. The Osprey 2 years ago

    Not even mentioned is the fact that Trump’s wife is from Slovenia. I need to find out more about her political background, but I’m thinking the fact that she is Eastern European could be a positive factor in a Trump administration’s relationship with the Visegrad countries, and their attempts to create a European solidarity against Islamic “immigrant” invasion.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Hey Osprey- Thanks for the comment! Would love to know how you got lead to the site. I guess she is from Slovenia isn’t it? I certainly think the Visegrad countries, and Eastern Europe in general, are the future of Europe (and our race).

      • The Osprey 2 years ago

        You’re welcome. I can’t remember how I found this site. I might have stumbled upon it while searching for a now defunct(?) blog called Eurocollapse.

        • Author
          Admin 2 years ago

          Right on. I haven’t heard of it. Well I am glad you stumbled upon it! Thanks for the comments!

  5. Laguna Beach Fogey 2 years ago

    EU military police carry out ‘extremely WORRYING’ civil unrest crisis training

    A MILITARY police unit have carried out European Union-funded special training, ready to be deployed in the event of civil unrest or war.


    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Hey Laguna Beach- I read the article and their perspective seemed ambiguous as to ‘what’ this was in preparation for. Like as if some might read it as thinking it would be to protect against refugees or Cologne type events. But obviously it is to protect against the native Whites if or when they (we) rise up.

      • Laguna Beach Fogey 2 years ago

        I noticed that too. Very amusing. They’re desperately trying to ignore the elephant in the room.

  6. Matt Edge 2 years ago

    Hillary Clinton is the true revolutionary in this election. Trump will at best just be a reformer. With Hillary there is a real sense of hope that her obnoxious and intolerable attitude and female incompetence will destroy the system of judeo-western democracy and Marxism which all needs to go. She has way more wrecking potential than Trump.

    I’m pretty sure Trump is a controlled opposition political stunt. What Obama was to liberals in ’08 with his hopey change demagoguery, Trump is to White men in 2016 with his talk of banning Muslims and building walls. It’s what his target audience likes to hear, but that’s what makes democracy so feminine and revolting–it’s based on words, not deeds.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Hey Matt-

      I’m definitely not jumping on the Trump train and becoming a full-out Kool-Aid drinker. I do think his campaign is a lot more disruptive to the establishment than Obama’s was though. When Obama was the nominee it basically FULFILLED a vision and wish and goal that the American establishment had had for decades at that point. Even though the Republicans ran against Obama, and many might have disliked his specific policies as a liberal, they still were just as ‘invested’ in the idea of a black president as the Democrats were.

      With Trump neither party establishment likes him. He is disrupting the entire continuum. Now, do I think he is going to get into office and be a perfect representation of what people like us think? Of course not. But I still appreciate the big ‘screw you’ he represents to the establishment and the fact that he is very much riding a tide of popular white anger. But yeah, I think its all controlled opposition to some point 🙂

  7. RichardJames 2 years ago

    This is not hyperbole. In most West European nations today, the 18-30 year old male demographic — those of fighting age — will be majority Muslim in the next 1-5 years.
    Intersting analysis on how a Trump presidency would impact upon the currently Marxist driven, European nations.
    However, the above quote taken from the article is somewhat premature with its estimate of majority non white 18-30 yrs within the next 5 yrs in most Western European countries.
    Whilst its true that in many European cities the highest birth rates are amongst non whites, this is not the case across the continent as a whole. Not yet.
    Even with the admission of Turkey, the above estimate is still narrow a time scale.
    This buys us a little more time to prepare.
    The estimate will eventually become true for obvious reasons and we should not relax just because it will be a few years further away.
    Small local cells that have studied riot police tactics, trained together and trust each other will bode well.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Hey RichardJames thanks for the comment! I wasn’t talking about Western Europe as a whole, but my understanding is that France, Belgium, Netherlands, Austria, Greece, Italy, and Germany specifically are within that 1-5 year horizon for that specific demographic. I do not have the source though but I believe it was from last winter, and was estimating based on number of incoming ‘refugees’. Obviously impossible to know for sure, but that demographic is a rather small ‘natural’ one right now in Europe, but equals something like 68% of incoming ‘refugees’, so it is easy for it to become skewed. I will try to find the source 🙂

      I agree that small local cells with some amount of tactical expertise will fare well. Do you have any thoughts on the best courses of study/ways to prepare/etc? What other thoughts do you have on active resistance?

      • Laguna Beach Fogey 2 years ago

        “Total Resistance: A Guerrilla Warfare Manual for Everyone” by von Dach.

      • RichardJames 2 years ago

        Hello mate,
        I’ll take your word for the figures, as im not about to scour the web looking at demographic charts .
        I’m in the UK, which has around 20 yrs until this prognosis is in effect. Although if you live in Bradford, Luton, Birminghan or London then you’re pretty living it now.

        It cannot be stressed enough, the necessity for in person or face to face training.

        SS Werewolf Training and Combat. Michael Fagnon. Its available on amazon still I believe. Though for German Brothers probably not. Still we can get around that i’m sure.

        Thanks Laguna for the book tip, i’ll look out for that.
        Here’s a link to a site that I just discovered, anyone familiar with it ?
        Looks very good at a cursory glance .

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Thanks for the link RichardJames. I clicked on it the other day and was reading it before being interrupted, but now it does not work. Any 4GW style inspiration or instruction for our people is a very good thing however.

  8. TimeIsNow 2 years ago

    The mistake of this article is to go completely by demographics, yet they are important. The question, when it comes down to civil war is, who has the best solders? Who has the best tactics? Are the opposition concentrated in just a few position that can be taken out as a whole? Strategic overviews? Who has the best Marksmen with various guns, and even sniper abilities? Access to modern weapons?

    In the USA as an example, over 85% of the trained elite warriors are White Males, and nearly all the top snipers and even pistol marksmen are White Males. The best people in top military tactics and Strategy are mainly Whites and not Leftists. HMM. How does that stack up in Europe. I’m sure that the Swiss train even their general citizens as good shot even without military training, but they are not EU.

    Again, in the USA, in the South and in many parts of the West people grow up leartning to shoot well.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Hey TimeIsNow- thanks for the comment!

      You are certainly spot on that demographics isn’t everything. I think in an actual 4GW conflict the things you cite would indeed have a greater outcome on victory. I think demograhics is more relevant on a macro level in its ability to suggest which countries are likely to see civil conflict arise first. Or, if one wants to think about it long term, ignoring the fact that civil war will come, it would mean those countries will become Muslim ruled first.

      But yeah I certainly take greater solace in those facts you pointed out, and look forward to when we can put those superior capabilities to work for us.

      Appreciate your readership and commenting! Please jump in any chance you get the comments are HUGE motivation for my work on the site! Also if there are any topics you would like to see covered please let me know!


  9. TimeIsNow 2 years ago

    There are a couple of what I’d call “Macro Tactics” that could be used specifically against Muslims in a future Civil War, at least when things first get really Hot.

    Strengths of their culture will turn into weaknesses, as their lack of integration makes them concentrate into “No-Go Zones” or big enclaves. That works out well for them now as they can hide their most zealous warriors, and the SJW Leftist protect their groups. Yet after Europeans have had enough and push the Leftist SJW into Hell and the moderate left has switched sides because relatives have been killed, maimed, or traumatized by these 1400 year criminals without a conscious.

    Just think of it, now the strength turns into a huge disadvantage. Just take some of the worst “No-Go Zones” surround them with razor wire and either force everyone to surrender without weapons or simply burn out the whole Zone without mercy then broadcast the results all over Europe after taking out a few of these.

    Another strength that can be turned into weakness is their extended families. Now, it is another factor that extends secrecy and protection, but in India, when a Muslim commits Jihad, the Hindus trace back the persons responsible to their families and kills them all …. mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles, cousins, and etc.. It’s easy to sacrifice oneself if you think Paradise is the reward, but the rest of your family has not earned Paradise. Anyway, Jihad has be cut way back by the slaughter of Muslim extended families in India for Jihad criminals.

    Just a suggestion, after the breakdown, look for cultural weaknesses that can be easily exploited after the SJW extreme Leftists are all just gone.

    • Author
      Admin 2 years ago

      Hey TimeIsNow, not sure if you will see this response, but I only just saw your comment.

      I agree completely that the Muslims very much take advantage of the current system vis a vis the urban environments, welfare, etc. I think in a true dog eat dog world, while their greater tribalism and ‘state of nature’ mindsets will benefit them greatly, I think that native Europeans are far more adept at survival, ingenuity, building, planning, coordinating, etc. I do like the odds for our people in a place like Sweden, that is for sure.

      I also feel it is very apparent that as life, or life in a specific country, goes back to normal, and as the artificiality of modernity (shopping malls, police, surveillance cameras, etc) proves unsustainable, and things revert back to how they are naturally (as they did in Russia after the fall of Communism in the 1990’s for example), that all those (SJW) things, which are laughably artificial as well, such as feminism, will die away too.

      For just as the Muslims are very used to existing in cities, propped up by state’s largesse, so too are our SJW opponents. Things like feminism and flamboyant homosexuality do not survive real life. They only exist because our societies have created so much wealth and prosperity and security that people are able to delve into these real experimental extremes. The example I always cite is the 9/11 flight that was hijacked, in which the passengers rose up and fought back. Because while some of those female passengers might have been ‘liberated’ career women when they got on that plane, as soon as things hit the fan, and the environment on board was reduced to a state of nature, feminism dissapeared, and the women were (rightfully) in back, finding weapons, taking care of the wounded, etc, while the men were the ones who charged the cockpit, and fought with the bare hands to save the lives of those on the ground below.

      • DaShui 2 years ago

        The super dome Katrina experience also had men circling the wagons, European men manned up.


        • Author
          Admin 2 years ago

          As I have said before you are the master of good links DaShui! Very helpful one. I would actually like to publish an article on what happens when we have little mini-societal collapses like that, and things return to the law of the jungle. And show that things like feminism, and multiculturalism and non-violence and all these other utterly artificial, ridiculous notions just fly out the window. The Shanksville, PA flight on 9/11 is a great example, as is this Katrina one you linked to. If you have any others please send them my way and I will put them into an article or we can co-write it or something.

  10. Augustus 1 year ago

    “Let us not be blind to the magnitude of events, for surely our descendants will read about them in the history books for long centuries to come. The next decade will mark either Europe’s submission and death, or its decision to fight and survive.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFWOzENwX3M I have to admit, it’s hard not to LARP and fantasize a bit about just how significant this conflict will be, as well as the role we play in it.


  1. […] Juliana Langnesse What Would A Trump Presidency Mean For The War In Europe? vyšla na stránkách European Civil War 27. dubna […]

  2. […] The flipside of such a phenomenon would be what occurs if Trump wins, as we all know that would unfortunately cause the European left to double down on virtue signalling and act even more suicidal. At the same time a Trump presidency would have other, very positive effects on Europe however, as I have written about previously. […]

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *